Often in programming it's not the code itself that is hard, it's all the environment and systems around it. I found that today when trying to contribute to an open source repository.
Today I was working on some code and using the excellent data-science-types to type check some Pandas code with
But for some reason I was getting a weird error when reading with
read_feather some data I just wrote with
to_feather, and so I switched my
to_feather to be
to_pickle which doesn't do as much conversion.
This worked fine but then
mypy had an error:
error: "Series[Any]" not callable
It must have thought that
df.to_pickle was the name of a column, because it wasn't in the type stub.
Well through the wonders of open source I can easily fix that, I opened an issue, cloned the repository and as per the instructions installed it in a virtualenv with
pip install -e ".[dev]" and ran the tests with
./check_all.sh (it's great that they are clear and make it easy to get set up and run the tests).
But then I ran into an issue; one of the Pandas tests fails before I've even changed the code.
I see that it's using Pandas 1.2 which just came out in the last 2 weeks, so I install the previous version of Python using
pip install "pandas<1.2" (note the quote; I keep forgetting it and my shell tries to do input redirection), and run the tests and sure enough it passes.
I open an issue about the failing tests.
I spent some time trying to work out what the test was and why it was failing, but I couldn't get to the bottom of it after half an hour or so, and so move on to the changes.
I make the changes and they're relatively straightforward, and I set up a pull request. However the CI tests fail (but only in the Python 3.9 environment, not in Python 3.6 which must have got an earlier version of Pandas) because of the issue I had. The maintainer agrees we can workaround by limiting Pandas to <1.2 for now until the tests are fixed. Luckily I'm familiar with Github actions from publishing this website and so I quickly see how to make this change and get the tests passing.
At the end of the day a straighforward change ends up taking a couple of hours because I had to work around an unrelated test was failing due to a change in another package. This could have been caught earlier, at the time of the upstream change, if the tests ran regularly (say weekly).